| Merus ltd and the world of Jason (fta) |
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 67
Likes: 106
Location: Terra dei Cachi
854705.00 NLN Dollars
Tournament Dollars
|
Hello 
Probably you have never heard of Merus ltd and some of you, I imagine only a few, read the name Jason (fta) in the various forums that are interested in the casino world.
The company Merus controls the following casinos: Raging Bull (RTG), Grand Fortune (RTG), MalibuClub (Rival), Kings Chance (TopGame) and SunsetSlots (TopGame).
This individual has a very strong personality, in the lives of all of us there is a Jason-of-all-trades...is the one who knows everything, who knows how to put everything in place...an hasher.
The only problem is that he should solve the issues that concern the casino where he works but often, almost always, this does not happen.
There is a huge amount of complaints unresolved, many players have been deceived and suffered mockery ... with the approval of the moderators of the various forums.
Unfortunately there are many people who continue to procure customers for this company and it adheres to their affiliate program...FTA... the Fast Track Affiliates.
If you visit their site there is a list of their accomplices, in the lower part of the page (Testimonials)
|
|
Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 101537
Likes: 46860
Location: Gambleville
3094521.10 NLN Dollars
Tournament Dollars
|
WildWildFrank, Thanks for the review. NoLuckNeeded.com does not recommend Raging Bull Casino, Grand Fortune Casino and the rest of those casinos due to their use of predatory dormancy clauses which seize account balances for inactivity. Fast Track casinos also use maximum cashout deposit bonuses which I despise. Furthermore, the group uses aggressive marketing tactics including phone calls and texts.
In addition there are a multitude of non payment and slow payment complaints all over the internet for Raging Bull, GrandFortune, and ect. I urge noluckneeded members to avoid all Fast Track Affiliate casinos.
_________________
|
|
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 67
Likes: 106
Location: Terra dei Cachi
854705.00 NLN Dollars
Tournament Dollars
|
TDTAT, I fully tuned with your way of thinking.
Thank you all for welcoming me into this wonderful forum!
I read your reviews on the casino and I am impressed ... cause is it so hard to find objectivity and honesty in certain contexts.
|
|
Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 101537
Likes: 46860
Location: Gambleville
3094521.10 NLN Dollars
Tournament Dollars
|
WildWildFrank, Thank you for the kind words. Most sites were created to make money. NoLuckNeeded was created by "cho" (the administrator) as a hobby. He is a gambler and a website designer. I joined the site as a gambler just like any other member. This site does make money now, but we only recommend casinos that we trust to treat players how we want to be treated and we actually play at most of the casinos we recommend. 
_________________
|
|
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 67
Likes: 106
Location: Terra dei Cachi
854705.00 NLN Dollars
Tournament Dollars
|
Hello
I think it's not easy to maintan a website, it requires a real effort...it's a job.
So it is reasonable to expect a gain ... that's not wrong.
But some sites have to put their critical sense for sale, to achieve greater earning.
And the opinion of a famous site comes to mind. they express a criticism about the reliability of a jurisdiction..
"...quick procedure for obtaining a license to run gaming operations and no information on dispute resolution mechanisms....
we are only aware of *one* group of casinos currently licensed in XXXXXXX,...
they have proven themselves to be an honest and trustworthy operator after more than XX years in business. However if any other new operators without such a history do decide to set themselves up in XXXXXXXX in the future we would urge caution before sending any money their way."
so if a jurisdiction is more or less secure it depends on the sites that use it?
or maybe that jurisdiction was chosen because it offers fewer controls, impunity and more opportunities to cheat players?
This is a clear example of incoherence in payment.
|
|
